<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Death of Hierarchy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tagsonomy.com/index.php/the-death-of-hierarchy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tagsonomy.com/index.php/the-death-of-hierarchy/</link>
	<description>a blog on tagging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 01:32:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: blinklisters</title>
		<link>http://tagsonomy.com/index.php/the-death-of-hierarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>blinklisters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tagsonomy.com/index.php/the-death-of-hierarchy/#comment-102</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it is all either or.  I find hierarchy also useful and at the same time I love tagging.  At www.blinklist.com, a brand new social bookmarking site, we tried to come up with a way to have some structure.  Would love to hear from the experts in this community of what you think on the organization that we have tried to come up with.  I have to admit that reading this blog inspired us to think creatively and think outside the box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it is all either or.  I find hierarchy also useful and at the same time I love tagging.  At <a href="http://www.blinklist.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.blinklist.com</a>, a brand new social bookmarking site, we tried to come up with a way to have some structure.  Would love to hear from the experts in this community of what you think on the organization that we have tried to come up with.  I have to admit that reading this blog inspired us to think creatively and think outside the box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tedh2000</title>
		<link>http://tagsonomy.com/index.php/the-death-of-hierarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>tedh2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tagsonomy.com/index.php/the-death-of-hierarchy/#comment-98</guid>
		<description>I think there&#039;s alot involved here, depending on how you look at it.  Hierarchy is helpful to advance organize a user to what resources are available.  Indices and Search are good when the hierarchy is either too deep or wide (or both), and/or what they are looking for is something rather specific.

Personally, I value hierarchies when I am need to be overview-ed to what&#039;s available.  Or if I&#039;m not quite sure what I am looking for...

I like the idea though, that I don&#039;t have to always drill-down to find something.  And for that I like the idea that hierarchies can be bypassed at-will.  But will they go away completely?  Maybe I am just to used to them and need to warm up to that idea, I don&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s alot involved here, depending on how you look at it.  Hierarchy is helpful to advance organize a user to what resources are available.  Indices and Search are good when the hierarchy is either too deep or wide (or both), and/or what they are looking for is something rather specific.</p>
<p>Personally, I value hierarchies when I am need to be overview-ed to what&#8217;s available.  Or if I&#8217;m not quite sure what I am looking for&#8230;</p>
<p>I like the idea though, that I don&#8217;t have to always drill-down to find something.  And for that I like the idea that hierarchies can be bypassed at-will.  But will they go away completely?  Maybe I am just to used to them and need to warm up to that idea, I don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agylen &#187; A world without folders is not a world without structure</title>
		<link>http://tagsonomy.com/index.php/the-death-of-hierarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Agylen &#187; A world without folders is not a world without structure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2005 07:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tagsonomy.com/index.php/the-death-of-hierarchy/#comment-97</guid>
		<description>[...] simple implementations (like folders) we will never see them disappear completely.&#8221; 	The Death of Hierarchy? Gene Smith: &#8220;Indeed, structure is useful. And instead of one [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] simple implementations (like folders) we will never see them disappear completely.&#8221; 	The Death of Hierarchy? Gene Smith: &#8220;Indeed, structure is useful. And instead of one [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

