Comments on: Yummy and yummier http://tagsonomy.com/index.php/yummy-and-yummier/ a blog on tagging Wed, 01 Sep 2010 01:32:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Emily http://tagsonomy.com/index.php/yummy-and-yummier/comment-page-1/#comment-6118 Emily Wed, 01 Nov 2006 13:13:06 +0000 http://tagsonomy.com/index.php/yummy-and-yummier/#comment-6118 <strong>Yep</strong> There's no place like ~ Yep

There’s no place like ~

]]> By: TechCrunch » Profile: DinnerBuzz http://tagsonomy.com/index.php/yummy-and-yummier/comment-page-1/#comment-536 TechCrunch » Profile: DinnerBuzz Sun, 22 Jan 2006 04:56:17 +0000 http://tagsonomy.com/index.php/yummy-and-yummier/#comment-536 [...] king services it could become a very useful service over time. Links: Site About Tag Cloud You’re It (“It may not seem like it matters SO much now but once we start buildin [...] [...] king services it could become a very useful service over time. Links: Site About Tag Cloud You’re It (“It may not seem like it matters SO much now but once we start buildin [...]

]]> By: BuzzMachine » Blog Archive » Made for the distributed world http://tagsonomy.com/index.php/yummy-and-yummier/comment-page-1/#comment-147 BuzzMachine » Blog Archive » Made for the distributed world Mon, 18 Jul 2005 02:55:04 +0000 http://tagsonomy.com/index.php/yummy-and-yummier/#comment-147 [...] I just came across Dinnerbuzz (catching up on my RSS after vacation; saw it via You’re It). Though the execution is iffy at best, the concept is close to what I’m [...] [...] I just came across Dinnerbuzz (catching up on my RSS after vacation; saw it via You’re It). Though the execution is iffy at best, the concept is close to what I’m [...]

]]> By: TechCrunch http://tagsonomy.com/index.php/yummy-and-yummier/comment-page-1/#comment-111 TechCrunch Mon, 04 Jul 2005 04:39:05 +0000 http://tagsonomy.com/index.php/yummy-and-yummier/#comment-111 <strong>Profile: DinnerBuzz</strong> Company: Dinnerbuzz Launched: June 2005 What is it? Dinnerbuzz is a new service that allows users to provide feedback on restaurants, bars and coffee shops. It leverages user-provided metadata (including tagging) to allow others to easily find an... Profile: DinnerBuzz

Company: Dinnerbuzz

Launched: June 2005
What is it?
Dinnerbuzz is a new service that allows users to provide feedback on restaurants, bars and coffee shops. It leverages user-provided metadata (including tagging) to allow others to easily find an…

]]> By: justinsmith http://tagsonomy.com/index.php/yummy-and-yummier/comment-page-1/#comment-110 justinsmith Sat, 02 Jul 2005 07:28:52 +0000 http://tagsonomy.com/index.php/yummy-and-yummier/#comment-110 Hi Alex, Thanks for your thoughtful and thorough comments. I really appreciate them. I just wanted to let you know that the "search by rating" feature has now been added to all global and local tag views. More is on the way! Thanks again, Justin Hi Alex,

Thanks for your thoughtful and thorough comments. I really appreciate them.

I just wanted to let you know that the “search by rating” feature has now been added to all global and local tag views. More is on the way!

Thanks again,
Justin

]]> By: Anthony Eden http://tagsonomy.com/index.php/yummy-and-yummier/comment-page-1/#comment-104 Anthony Eden Wed, 29 Jun 2005 19:15:19 +0000 http://tagsonomy.com/index.php/yummy-and-yummier/#comment-104 The problem with complex tag combinations is determining grouping. For example, what if I want curry and either indian or thai? It might be curry+indian|thai, but do I mean (curry+indian)|thai or do I mean curry+(indian|thai). Does the parser need to know about grouping and if so have we exceeded the complexity levels that an average user is willing or able to support? This is my stopping point for adding complex functionality to Tagsurf. FWIW Tagsurf has been using the /tag/foo format from day 1 along with a lot of other nice friendly URLs. The problem with complex tag combinations is determining grouping. For example, what if I want curry and either indian or thai? It might be curry+indian|thai, but do I mean (curry+indian)|thai or do I mean curry+(indian|thai). Does the parser need to know about grouping and if so have we exceeded the complexity levels that an average user is willing or able to support? This is my stopping point for adding complex functionality to Tagsurf.

FWIW Tagsurf has been using the /tag/foo format from day 1 along with a lot of other nice friendly URLs.

]]> By: unquiet http://tagsonomy.com/index.php/yummy-and-yummier/comment-page-1/#comment-103 unquiet Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:44:37 +0000 http://tagsonomy.com/index.php/yummy-and-yummier/#comment-103 As far as apache or lighttpd-powered sites go, it's a simple matter of rewrite rules to get the tag syntax like delicious, regardless of the original setup. It looks like the DinnerBuzz people just haven't put any rewrite rules in... The real question is... how do we support more complex tag combinations? What if I want to search for results containing 'curry' and 'indian' but not 'bangalore'? Should it be /tag/curry/indian/-bangalore ? /tag/curry+indian-bangalore ? Or how about searching for Thai OR Indian curry? /tag/curry/indian|thai ? Standardisation is nice, but it has to go further than just the basics, or the REAL difficulty with tag subscriptions will begin to rear its ugly head. As far as apache or lighttpd-powered sites go, it’s a simple matter of rewrite rules to get the tag syntax like delicious, regardless of the original setup. It looks like the DinnerBuzz people just haven’t put any rewrite rules in…

The real question is… how do we support more complex tag combinations? What if I want to search for results containing ‘curry’ and ‘indian’ but not ‘bangalore’?

Should it be /tag/curry/indian/-bangalore ? /tag/curry+indian-bangalore ?

Or how about searching for Thai OR Indian curry? /tag/curry/indian|thai ?

Standardisation is nice, but it has to go further than just the basics, or the REAL difficulty with tag subscriptions will begin to rear its ugly head.

]]>